Good of you to show up Clay. I refer to what I'm tuned to; what customers perceive when they see something that those in the industry wouldn't give a second thought.
Take a look at my original post. I liked the site overall, and made comments that I would like to have taken as constructive suggestions. You can argue with my observations, but when a customer sees the same things you will lose them without ever knowing you did. If these things even have the potential to bring up a negative connotation in a customer's mind they should be changed. Arguing with the customer about their perception won’t be an option.
Here's a little more in-depth reasoning; disagree if you choose.
An ad for an auto shop or sewer repair service wouldn't show a guy covered in his work, even if the customer knows the guy can't look like a fashion model all day. Having a guy (and any of his equipment) look presentable for pictures is common sense. Aaron looks fine, uniform not needed, but clean clothes would make for a more professional presentation.
Split screen isn't the issue with before and after pictures. If a repair is done to the lower right quadrant of a rug, the after picture should be of the lower right quadrant of the rug. The “car wax guys” might show two sides of the same hood, but they wouldn’t expect you to believe the cruddy hood was fixed when the after picture showed a shiny trunk. The Navajo shows different ends of the same rug, or a similar rug, something I think is fairly obvious to any observer. The dye bleed might have been throughout the rug, and both ends may have looked great after cleaning, but an end for end swap suggests a shell game.
Regardless of whether the Chinese was beautifully cleaned, the appearance is so radically different that it doesn't look like good cleaning, it looks like color stripping. In my opinion what a customer might think will happen to their once colorful rug.