years ago when reps started pushing acid rinses, (part of
Prochem's "max clean/min residue" marketing) the Prochem rep told us of how just a coupe drops of acid rinse left in the sprayer could contaminate and make protectant less effective .
The gist of that was to use different sprayers (one dedicated to protectant only)
OK, that makes sense to me.
The part that didn't make sense was leaving acid rinse on the carpet before protectant .
and the most incongruent one was to spritz acid rinse on the carpet if you didn't run it thru the wand
Then apply protectant
when I asked, if a couple drops of acid rinse contaminates the whole pot of protectant (as he told us an hour previously ) why wouldn't that same reaction happen spraying protectant on carpet that's been spritzed with acid rinse?
didn't get much of an answer to my question
bottom line??
don't over think protectant, Dude
the truth is, it's greatest benefit is to $
our bottom line$ . that's the reason we push it
cause the way we apply water based protectant to carpets* topically on site ain't sheeit in reality...it's crap
*on carpets in particular ...upl fabric is different, it does make difference because we're applying to a flat surface .
Not a fiber bundle we'd have to
soak to actually get any real effect
..L.T.A.