Walrus Gumboot
Member
Do any of you steam cleaners bash VLM cleaning techniques in your advertising?
Do you warn potential customers that VLM methods produce inferior results?
Besides the "method most recommended by manufacturers" line that we all use to justify steam cleaning, do you go beyond that and specifically mention any of the problems you feel like are associated with VLM methods?
I think we(steam cleaners) should make an effort to bash these inferior cleaners every chance we get,just like they do us.
Every single one of them are just alike, and their scare tactic marketing is creating a service industry with lowered quality results.
Is "DRY" carpet the objective?
Is "Somewhat cleaner,but DRY" a standard that you should strive to achieve?
With all due respect,Wayne....
"A concerned carpet cleaner wrote to an industry magazine some years ago about his hot water extraction process, often referred to as "steam cleaning." His equipment sprayed pressurized water into the carpet at a rate of three gallons per minute, or one hundred-eighty gallons per hour. His concern? At that rate, even if ninety percent of the water were recovered there could still be as much as eighteen gallons unaccounted for. Our Controlled-Moisture System could perform three or four average cleanings with the water this fellow was concerned about leaving behind!"
bite me
Do you warn potential customers that VLM methods produce inferior results?
Besides the "method most recommended by manufacturers" line that we all use to justify steam cleaning, do you go beyond that and specifically mention any of the problems you feel like are associated with VLM methods?
I think we(steam cleaners) should make an effort to bash these inferior cleaners every chance we get,just like they do us.
Every single one of them are just alike, and their scare tactic marketing is creating a service industry with lowered quality results.
Is "DRY" carpet the objective?
Is "Somewhat cleaner,but DRY" a standard that you should strive to achieve?
With all due respect,Wayne....
"A concerned carpet cleaner wrote to an industry magazine some years ago about his hot water extraction process, often referred to as "steam cleaning." His equipment sprayed pressurized water into the carpet at a rate of three gallons per minute, or one hundred-eighty gallons per hour. His concern? At that rate, even if ninety percent of the water were recovered there could still be as much as eighteen gallons unaccounted for. Our Controlled-Moisture System could perform three or four average cleanings with the water this fellow was concerned about leaving behind!"
bite me