In its own way, the CRI defeated its purpose.
Mr Braun, whom I've been told is a fine gentleman and a very engaging individual, was there to be a positive PR representative for the SOA. Had he handled tough questions with respect and reflection, and even if he had done some minor side stepping, he could have at least shown that the CRI has a listening ear and a sense of reasonableness.
By allowing his host to put those restrictions on the audience, he defeated that purpose, and likely left with no one feeling much impressed with his presentation.
You'd think an adroit politician (such people are, of course, ultimately politicians) would even allow himself to be treated a bit roughly, and then handle it gallantly. Politicians have been known to plant "tough customers" just to let them play the role of the "noble and persecuted".
Most fair minded individuals would have then sided with him for having played his part fairly and bravely, and he'd have scored points there too.
All in all, I suppose I'm happy it happened this way. I can't imagine that CRI scored any points today.
I'd appreciate feedback from anyone else who was there.