Desk Jockey
Member
We had a death scene yesterday was different from the others that we have seen.
What was really different was after killing the occupant, the suspect set the place on fire to cover up the crime. It was very smoky, lots of soot and fire damage.
The soot hid most of the blood so it made it difficult to distinguish what was what even with intense lighting.
Our normal testing solution was not working well, I'm guessing because of the heat from the fire. Does the heat from the fire affect the blood to the point it is no longer a threat? Of course we still treat it as if it were, but I'm assuming it's not.
There were still contents, bedding and other items that were away from the heat that reacted normal, so that's why I'm questioning what affect the heat has on possible infectious fluids.
Anyone have any experience with heat, soot and blood?
What was really different was after killing the occupant, the suspect set the place on fire to cover up the crime. It was very smoky, lots of soot and fire damage.
The soot hid most of the blood so it made it difficult to distinguish what was what even with intense lighting.
Our normal testing solution was not working well, I'm guessing because of the heat from the fire. Does the heat from the fire affect the blood to the point it is no longer a threat? Of course we still treat it as if it were, but I'm assuming it's not.
There were still contents, bedding and other items that were away from the heat that reacted normal, so that's why I'm questioning what affect the heat has on possible infectious fluids.
Anyone have any experience with heat, soot and blood?