Bravo, Bryan...
Good post.
I especially like the response to the question as to the change to make it more valuable to customers.
The
IICRC is a monumental asset to this industry. It's just a broken asset, that's all. A "broken asset" is not simply dumped like a liability,...instead, you fix it.
The
IICRC is principally owned by Industry Trade Associations, but are little influenced by them. Instead, all of the management, oversight and business planning has been ceded to interests that do not represent the Association' s interests. In doing so, the
IICRC has evolved into an entity that supports those interests above that of the intent of the ownership. In fact, the
IICRC even competes in many cases with Associations on their purpose!
Over time, the ownerships interests have seen a myriad of small skirmishes that were intent on reversing this problem. Each time, one step forward and one step back has been the terminal result. In the last year, we've witnessed some serious changes that offer promise to return control to the ownership's interests. Coincidentally, and unfortunately the industry has observed some serious blunders as a result of some awkward transitioning that make the
IICRC look worse off and less polished than it ever has. The result is threads like this...questioning the value of
IICRC to the industry.
We have some serious power to produce change. A few people actually have done so. People like Tony Wheelright, getting involved at the right level... the ownership level. Like him, we need to get more people involved in leadership positions within the trade associations that own the
IICRC. Others need to support those who take on these volunteer positions, and hold them accountable. Too many good people have been either beat back by the machine, or in a few select cases, corrupted by the machine that resists the change we'd all like to see.
-Shawn-