gregcole said:
So I am curious - who here (vendors and manufacturers excluded) think
glides truly help them clean better? I would love to hear the pro's and cons.
I do.
simply because they ease the chore of wanding.
fatigue isn't conducive to quality.
Glides made the job easier.
They can also eliminate and/or reduce wand chatter that happens on many type carpets
the drying time claims are over blown IMO
they certainly are on cut piles anyway.
I figure the dudes claiming dramatic decreased dry times have never done side by side evaluations on same room, same wand, same time, same way (I have) or they'd know better.
Or it's simply a mater of.....for the first time in their miserable lives, they're not to lazy to add dry strokes.....
Most are going by how the carpet "feels" a minute after the wand has run over it.
The difference does "feel" dramatic right away, but feel both sides 30 minutes latter and you won't be able to tell the difference.
The exception would be some carpet types that the wand "locks down" on and airflow is choked off.
(ie...a worn CGD)
A glide is a benefit to dry times then, cause it can aid in preventing total lock down due to more lip surface area
on the flip side of that, the larger surface area can have a detrimental effect too.
an example would be the raised pattern berbers or loop piles.
a "tight suck" on those is better for solution recovery and a glide can actually leave those type carpets wetter
The hole glide doesn't clean cut piles as deep as a slot glide or unglided wand.
It is however the easiest to push and works fine for tight short loop piles
The ideal situation is to use more than one wand set up with different glides, or have a notched wand that makes glide change effortless (that's what we do with our Ti wand)
in closing....are genuine "Greenglides teflon" glides "worth it"?
HELL YES!...they are to "us" anyway and I'll never be with out a hole and slot glide
donno about your flunkies with a porty in the back of Pinto though.
Maybe they'll like them, maybe they won't.
..L.T.A.