Yes, eliminating backpressure can alter the
AFR, but only on certain engines, here’s why (this comes from tuning VW-powered sandrails back in the day):
IF the intake runners are the right length, and IF there is enough valve overlap (time when both intake and exhaust valves are open at the same time, seen more in higher-rpm engines), and IF there is sufficient exhaust backpressure, then what is known as a ‘reversion pulse’ is created.
When the intake valve opens, a pressure wave literally pushes the air backwards up the intake plenum. As the air flows backwards through the carb, some of the fuel already drawn into the airstream goes too. In the VW’s I used to work on, you could see a little cloud of fuel in the carb throat because of this. When the pulse ends, the air flows back into the carb, drawing some more fuel on the way back in, enrichening the mixture even more. The carb jetting was set so this ‘double whammy’ resulted in the correct AFR.
In these type of engines, changing the backpressure WILL alter the mixture. Reducing backpressure can reduce or eliminate the reversion pulse. Without the pulse and resulting extra fuel, the mixture will lean out if jetting is not changed.
Do the small engines we see on truckmounts have this reversion pulse? I honestly don’t know. Probably not.
However, if you’re at any significant altitude above sea-level, and assuming your engine does not have a high-altitude kit installed, it is running rich anyway – as altitude increases and air density decreases, the carb metering gets confused and runs too rich. It gets pretty complex when you start accounting for all the variables.
All this only applies to carbureted engines. Modern injected engines monitor all this stuff and adjust the AFR on the fly. Changing the exhaust on one will have little to no effect on the AFR.