Procyon Vs. Procyon

Mikey P

Administrator
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
116,004
Location
The High Chapperal
vZGjAqCsm9psNCPgI-gt0jW70MO2DHkDXA3jnW1zIGhB9qyik5RhDmZg_7FrGozXj2ngi5jzVjP9o72EW3A=w560-h995-no.jpg


At the Atlanta Experience Show last week Ivan and I decided to have some fun and clean the same carpet with Procyon Extreme with two very different methods.
The test carpet (if you can call it that) was a thick rubber backed door mat material that has been abused for years in a entry way at the Marriott Marquis.

No pre vacuuming was performed.

On the bottom (left) side we used a Low Moisture Oscillating Pad machine w/ on board spray system with a Micro Fiber Blue/Stripped Bonnet.. A few wet passes were made and one or two dry passes.

On the upper (right) side we used a HydroForce inline sprayer to apply the Procyon Extreme, agitated in with a Brush Pro CRB then extracted with a Zipper Spinner wand ran at 900 psi mandatory spinner bars to move) hooked up to an El Diablo truckmount


The photo above was taken the next morning when Ivan, the inventor of Soap Free Procyon was viewing the carpet for the first time once dried. The wicking/browning that occurred on the Hot Water Extracted side was very apparent. No matter the cleaning agent used or the method, in an "extreme" soiling condition such as this, using as little water as possible is always best when the appearance is more important a goal rather than actual soil removal.

This was an interesting comparison on how cleaning agents are not quite as important in carpet cleaning as are the methods we chose to apply, agitate and extract them are.
This particular carpet could have really benefited from pre and post vacuuming as well as a touch up "post bonnet" the next day. When viewed 48 hours later the carpet looked like nothing at all had been done to it as both test sides wicked and re-soiled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Desk Jockey

Desk Jockey

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
64,833
Location
A planet far far away
Name
Rico Suave
Jimmy I asked him about your Free Sample. Yeahh he mumbled something and ran over my foot with his wheel chair.

I don't believe you'll be seeing them for quite awhile. :lol:
 

Cleanworks

Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,867
Location
New Westminster,BC
Name
Ron Marriott
View attachment 14206

At the Atlanta Experience Show last week Ivan and I decided to have some fun and clean the same carpet with Procyon Extreme with two very different methods.
The test carpet (if you can call it that) was a thick rubber backed door mat material that has been abused for years in a entry way at the Marriott Marquis.

No pre vacuuming was performed.

On the bottom (left) side we used a Low Moisture Oscillating Pad machine w/ on board spray system with a Micro Fiber Blue/Stripped Bonnet.. A few wet passes were made and one or two dry passes.

On the upper (right) side we used a HydroForce inline sprayer to apply the Procyon Extreme, agitated in with a Brush Pro CRB then extracted with a Zipper Spinner wand ran at 900 psi mandatory spinner bars to move) hooked up to an El Diablo truckmount


The photo above was taken the next morning when Ivan, the inventor of Soap Free Procyon was viewing the carpet for the first time once dried. The wicking/browning that occurred on the Hot Water Extracted side was very apparent. No matter the cleaning agent used or the method, in an "extreme" soiling condition such as this, using as little water as possible is always best when the appearance is more important a goal rather than actual soil removal.

This was an interesting comparison on how cleaning agents are not quite as important in carpet cleaning as are the methods we chose to apply, agitate and extract them are.
This particular carpet could have really benefited from pre and post vacuuming as well as a touch up "post bonnet" the next day. When viewed 48 hours later the carpet looked like nothing at all had been done to it as both test sides wicked and re-soiled.
Maybe the problem with the hwe side is the rubber backing. I betting that you found it a little more difficult to move the zipper than you would have on a regular cgd carpet. When the carpet tool is sticking, you are not removing enough water as there is very little airflow through the wand and hoses. It reminds me of a time when a guy was trying to sell me a high performance portable and was demonstrating on a rubber backed carpet. The wand stuck to the carpet and didn't remove very much water. It wasn't a very good demonstration and would have been more successful on a different carpet.
 

Desk Jockey

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
64,833
Location
A planet far far away
Name
Rico Suave
What I believe happened is the HWE used large volumes of water to flush out the soil load but because it was so impacted it cannot in one cleaning remove it all.

Why did the Encap do better? It used very little solotion and was nearly dry when complete. Was it truly cleaner?

No but it looked far better.

The point being Encap is great at appearance management. The HWE was actually the cleaneSt soil load wise. If you weighted both sides at the start and after cleaning the HWE side will show more soil removed.

The best cleaning would be to remove the soil load, then Encap for appearance. As it is it would be a very hard sell to tell the facilities manager that the HWE side is cleaner when it doesn't look it.

He only cares about appearance and the Encap side looked better.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom