Did you try a Glide with it?one came with the PM .
Got a couple hundred hours on them.
It's a flush monster , but too many warts to be a "regular everyday" wand.
Jet distortion on many cut piles.
Straight wand/no S-bend
The steel supply line will fry your skin
(any manufacture that uses steel supply lines should be beat with a rake handle)
Not the best for dry times
Rocks for blasting gum or candle wax out. (if your TM will make a minimum of 240)
Or a ratty chit-pit salvage rag (speeds up production in that scenario due to mega flush and heat)
not good for everyday res where a sledgehammer isn't needed and not the best dry times either
..L.T.A.
Did you try a Glide with it?
And possibly more useful for general rinsing?no
It's not a terribly hard wand to push like the Ti
It was a niche purpose wand on the truck for salvage rags and/or lots of gum/wax.
a glide would make it less useful for that
..L.T.A.
, it only had impact in the center, roughly 5" wide.
And possibly more useful for general rinsing?
Brass jet?I have around 4 yrs using the Steamway wand from back in the day.
Was happy when I jumped over to the PMF 802.
It was a flushing machine for sure. If hooked up to water it was fine.
I also experienced a ton of the distortion on certain carpets.
High flow really kept the kerosene burner roaring.
Nuttin like melting a jolly rancher
Brass jet?
Im pretty sure they included it as a do it all wand, and maybe a (new) stainless jet andba Glide would achieve that
The weight and the wand lips pinching in at the middle. The flood jet worked pretty good.What's the diff between that and a hydra hoe?
None.how many flood jet wands have you used in the "reel-world"?
are there any other wands that use a flood jet?
(PMF's 4" "gum getter" doesn't count)
and what's the difference in a brand new brass jet vs stainless?
They both start out the same and neither are ideal when spread that wide
..L.T.A.