LisaWagnerCRS
Member
Part of the problem with any type of organization with ethics contamination is trying to "remove the source." When the nominations slate is set by contaminated parts - you get more of the same over and over again.
These past few years there has been some slow, methodical, significant reforms taking root at IICRC.
And today I saw a sign of the real possibility of reform in this organization, in their press release on nominations:
Industry request for Nominations => http://bit.ly/iicrc-reforming
The recent and current reformers on the IICRC Board have not only reduced the size of the Board down to 15 (from up over 30 in my day), but have rewritten the qualifications to sit on the Board.
This is an opportunity to not only add qualified new leadership to the mix, but also with a smaller Board size, they don't get buried by the special interests which has always happened in the past.
I think this is a great sign... and I'm eager to see what the results are. And I really appreciate the work of those making this happen.
Lisa
P.S. My opinionated piece on this topic here. :mrgreen: => http://bit.ly/realdirt
These past few years there has been some slow, methodical, significant reforms taking root at IICRC.
And today I saw a sign of the real possibility of reform in this organization, in their press release on nominations:
Industry request for Nominations => http://bit.ly/iicrc-reforming
The recent and current reformers on the IICRC Board have not only reduced the size of the Board down to 15 (from up over 30 in my day), but have rewritten the qualifications to sit on the Board.
This is an opportunity to not only add qualified new leadership to the mix, but also with a smaller Board size, they don't get buried by the special interests which has always happened in the past.
I think this is a great sign... and I'm eager to see what the results are. And I really appreciate the work of those making this happen.
Lisa
P.S. My opinionated piece on this topic here. :mrgreen: => http://bit.ly/realdirt