Mikey P
Administrator
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2006
- Messages
- 116,869
Recent discussions on the subject got me thinking if it's really best to bring up the subject of the difference between the two terms.
How many times have you started to lecture clients on pH levels, rinse agents and gadgetry only to have them start to look over your shoulders and fade off?
Is "Eco Friendly" not good enough or does that just imply that you wont be creating Blinky the three eyed fish when you dump in their drive way?
in other words what looks better to the average concerned home owner on the side of your van..
"Safe Cleaning" or "Green Cleaning"
I asked my wife and she prefer's Green as it implies that the company is either certified to be labeled as such or they want to be..
How many times have you started to lecture clients on pH levels, rinse agents and gadgetry only to have them start to look over your shoulders and fade off?
Is "Eco Friendly" not good enough or does that just imply that you wont be creating Blinky the three eyed fish when you dump in their drive way?
in other words what looks better to the average concerned home owner on the side of your van..
"Safe Cleaning" or "Green Cleaning"
I asked my wife and she prefer's Green as it implies that the company is either certified to be labeled as such or they want to be..
and the hottest temps I can reasonably get at the fibre. My onboard Kinetico is fed by dechlorinated water and I only use a very hard to get and expensive salt pellet that is not processed using surfactants. This is not necessary for most people, but I do have a small percentage of ultra sensitive customers, who have discovered their infants sensitivities are greatly exasperated by even the small trace of surfactants in soft water treated with normal high quality salt pellets.
(BTW I do notice along main roads, freeways, the homes are a lot more soiled...I'd never move to a house along a main road.)