TimP said:
I've watched the Chem-dry videos. Their stuff don't clean worth a damn. You have to have some chemistry to go along with your agitation and rinsing(more flow/pressure than what they use) to clean well.
SO, would a rotary gives all the agitation, but will it clean with a "rinse" or does it need an emulsifier to continue to clean.
TimP said:
I disagree. It's better than a glided wand which don't clean worth a crap for heavy soiled carpet. It's ok for light to medium. An RX may not out clean a 175 high flow wand combination, I've never tested side by side. But it does clean quite well. You may of had one with stopped up jets or something because when they aren't spraying right it don't clean well. And flat jets do clean better than the stock cone jets, especially at 6 flow.
I have a CRBscrubber and high flow wand, plus it gets well vacuumed before hand
BTW, what are the jets on the 360i, flat? cone? 02's? 03's? 04's? 06's??
at 250psi would need pretty good flow to get the heat in from the truck.
The reasons I don't like the
RX20, it never seemed to dry the carpet as well as my glided wand. Its awkward to use. Works well for heavily soiled cgd esp when compared with a normal wand but I tried the glided greenhorn wand on the same cgd I had rotaried and got better results.
I'm all for improving tools and using them, but they need to be "improvements" over what's available. As in the demo video, a 360i vs an AW29 wand, no contest, the 360i wins.
vs a scrubber (
crb or 175) and a high flow greenhorn, debatable until tested.
Is the 360 that much faster than a scrub and wand, considering the passes need with it and also the edging with a wand? Does it work that much better than an
RX20?