Cleaning Zipper vs. TRex Jr.

Larry Cobb

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
5,795
Location
Dallas, Texas USA
Name
Larry Cobb
I wanted to see how these $2K wands compared in cleaning dirty carpet with a TM . . .
Michael Lochart brought over his almost new Zipper Wand . . .
and we furnished the TRex Jr. for comparison . . .
Lochart's tech presprayed the carpet with a Hydroforce sprayer from the Dynachem #4 blower TM that Mike brought over . . .
Then Lockhart pull-extracted with the Zipper and made two drying strokes (forward & back ). . .
Next up was the TRex Jr. which Lochart used a swing motion with a drying stroke afterwards . .
Overall, the cleaning time appeared similar . . .
This is the photo after cleaning, with Zipper on the left side TRex on Right :
ZipTRex.jpg
Next we checked relative moisture levels after cleaning (Zipper Left) :
ZipMoistu.jpg TRexMoist.jpg
Zipper left 2-3% less moisture in the carpet (averaged in 4 spots) .

Larry
 
Last edited:

Mikey P

Administrator
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
114,160
Location
The High Chapperal
If the trex could not out clean a "wand" thats pretty sad.

hundreds of passes vs two? really?

Either you two clowns have no idea how to clean or..


you two don't know how to test.
 

Larry Cobb

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
5,795
Location
Dallas, Texas USA
Name
Larry Cobb
Time difference?

As I said above, one cleaning pass and two dry passes for the Zipper . . .

One cleaning swing pass and one dry pass with the TRex Jr . . .

Overall time was very close according to the video's I took (within 5% ) . . .

I wanted to compare wands of the same price range (~$2100)

This is after 1st pass of Trex Jr with Ray's Light :

TRex1Pass.jpg
 
Last edited:

ruff

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
San Francisco, CA
Name
Ofer Kolton
IMHO- The whole idea with the Zipper (efficiency & volume) is not doing extra dry passes.
A good working comparison will be: Zipper flushing (wet) forward and dry back.
Compared to same with any rotary.
 

ruff

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
San Francisco, CA
Name
Ofer Kolton
I agree Steve, it achieves great dry times that way. And it is addictive to see the water through plastic pipe. I would do extra passes just to watch that extra recovery. Hypnotizing.
I could also do 12 dry slow passes with a wand and accomplish great dry time.

However when testing for comparison between tools, it makes more sense to do what's practically likely to happen.
 

Zee

Supportive Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,162
Location
SoCal jungle
Name
.
I still don't see the point of comparing a rotary extraction tool to a straight wand head (even if it has two vac slots)




If the zipper had 1 jet angled forward 1 jet angled backwards and so on (overall 3 would spray ahead and 3 behind) it might be interesting to see what it does. Erik, have you tried a manifold that was set up like that?
 

Desk Jockey

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
64,833
Location
A planet far far away
Name
Rico Suave
I still don't see the point of comparing a rotary extraction tool to a straight wand head
Zee!!!
We are carpet cleaners you can only ask "what's your favorite prespray" so many times before you have to move on to something else. ;)

Did you know Bristor now has the "Industry's Best" wand handle? :winky:
 

dealtimeman

Everyday is Saturday.
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
10,878
Location
Fort Worth , Texas
Name
Michael
I have bristors new handle but haven't put it on a wand yet, been to busy doing real world carpet cleaning testing with tight controls and protocols and what not!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Russ T.

Desk Jockey

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
64,833
Location
A planet far far away
Name
Rico Suave
I just try to wear shoes that don't have shoe strings is all, not very good with the whole tying of the laces.
You and Marty have trouble with tying

Lochart did all the cleaning . . .
He IS a real carpet cleaner . . .
Maybe Ray but Money? I bet you laughed just typing that! :winky:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom