Cobb/Dynachem Label design poll

[Mike Pailliotet]

Which label do you think Larry should use?

1

or


2

 

[Desk Jockey]

Consider hiring a graphic designer. #2 is a step backwards.

 

[Scott S.]

neither.

 

[FB19087]

out of the two..........old........... new is horrible

 

[Desk Jockey]

I like Lockhart too but I wouldn't let him design my product label.

 

[hogjowl]

Who cares?

 

[Johnny]

As long as the ink doesn't run, either works for me. It's what's inside that matters.

 

[Desk Jockey]

Who cares?

Most people buttt... evidently few pigs.

How it works is ultimately the deal breaker. However if the goal of the product label is to also have an ounce of marketing, it lacks that.

 

[hogjowl]

Those of us who actually purchase Larry's products are just happy to get them. We don't care if they look like Nick sold them.

 

[FB19087]

Who cares?

 

[hogjowl]

Thank you, Mr. Cotter.

 

[jcooper]

The new(bottom) one looks like a lemonade label...

Also, including dilution ratio for a hydro force would be helpful.

Those of us who actually purchase Larry's products are just happy to get them.

I agree, very thankful to stumble onto Larry's products. I appreciate him being here, very helpful.

 

[Nate The Great]

I thought the new one looks like a Grave or Tombstone...... The old never bothering me, just the recommended dilution ratios and shipping costs do.....

 

[Total_Rookie]

neither. He should use Dan Laurie's designer to look more modern and appealing.

 

[Charlie Lyman]

I need to be able to tell my sons what the bottle says. "Go get me the rust remover". I don't want to have to describe what the bottle looks like. The new bottle I would have to describe.

 

[Ralph Pastorelli]

Second one looks like a label from a cheap bottle of booze..lol

 

[Desk Jockey]

Uhhh Ralph....how would you know?

 

[A.J.]

It's amazing how much better that made the old label look. The old one doesn't need much....just something a little better. Also needs dilution ratios and unless it rubbed off I have a bottle I don't even know what the PH is.

 

[SamIam]

Uhhh Ralph....how would you know?

Remember that bottle he sent You last year for Xmas??? You didn't actually drink it???

Oh you did that's why you don't remember!

 

[Mike Pailliotet]

Damn..

I love the new one

 

[Desk Jockey]

I love children but I wouldn't let the design my product labels.

The old looks great in comparison to the new. If those are my only two options, I'd stick with the old.

 

[Nate The Great]

I love children but I wouldn't let the design my product labels.

The old looks great in comparison to the new. If those are my only two options, I'd stick with the old.

Even @Desk Jockey could come up with a better design....................and that's not saying much!

 

[Desk Jockey]

 

[mirf]

New design is terrible in my opinion.

 

[Scott S.]

Labels

need to be easy to see exactly what the product is from 10 feet away.
whats it should be used on
what the dillution is pump up, and hydroforce directions
PH labled right on the front of the bottle.

the label needs to be water resistant, no ink running after it gets damp, or gets a little wet in the rain, or whatever.

 

[KevinD]

Everyone likes the old label so Larry will go with #2

 

[SamIam]

I really don't care cause I can read, and I love Larry's broke dick prices, I'm mean affordable chemicals.

 

[SamIam]

I changed my vote I feel sorry for Mike being all alone.

 

[D Luke]

I like the new one, but there was nothing wrong with the old.

In fact, as more and more product lines get updated/flashier, the simple old school design becomes even more distinctive.

 

[Lee Stockwell]

The new one has a San Francisco look about it, other than the verboten word CHEMICALS being featured so prominently.