Contractor did not keep Dry Log now might come after us

cobrashells

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Messages
3
Location
Ohio
Name
Shelby
Hello! We had a tree go through our son's bedroom ceiling back in August and a mitigation contractor was contacted. Mitigation work officially completed as of Oct 8th 2024. They are still attempting to negotiate with insurance as of 12/21/24 because they had their dehumidifier and air purifying units running for 41 days with no supporting dry logs to substantiate legitimate reason for running equipment that long. Insurance is paying out 13 days and is willing to offer more if dry logs are submitted. They don't exist. I was here every single day of the equipment running and not a single person came to obtain readings. I can see in the emails between the contractor and insurance that the contractor has threatened to come after us for the balance not paid out by insurance. They cannot threaten a mechanics lien due to 60 days having already passed, but I would love to know my rights should I need to take it to court. From my readings of the IICRC S500, dry logs are required. They haven't contacted us yet; I'm just preparing for the worst ($20k they are attempting to collect) but hoping for the best.
 

Cleanworks

Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,517
Location
New Westminster,BC
Name
Ron Marriott
Hello! We had a tree go through our son's bedroom ceiling back in August and a mitigation contractor was contacted. Mitigation work officially completed as of Oct 8th 2024. They are still attempting to negotiate with insurance as of 12/21/24 because they had their dehumidifier and air purifying units running for 41 days with no supporting dry logs to substantiate legitimate reason for running equipment that long. Insurance is paying out 13 days and is willing to offer more if dry logs are submitted. They don't exist. I was here every single day of the equipment running and not a single person came to obtain readings. I can see in the emails between the contractor and insurance that the contractor has threatened to come after us for the balance not paid out by insurance. They cannot threaten a mechanics lien due to 60 days having already passed, but I would love to know my rights should I need to take it to court. From my readings of the IICRC S500, dry logs are required. They haven't contacted us yet; I'm just preparing for the worst ($20k they are attempting to collect) but hoping for the best.
Some companies use remote monitoring for their drying equipment. No need to personally come to the job. 41 days seems quite excessive unless it was still receiving moisture or there was a reason they couldn't remove wet portions. Sounds more like you need some legal advice. Things like, did you hire the restoration company or did the insurance company hire them. That may make a difference.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
3,050
Location
Montana
Name
Swani
Hello! We had a tree go through our son's bedroom ceiling back in August and a mitigation contractor was contacted. Mitigation work officially completed as of Oct 8th 2024. They are still attempting to negotiate with insurance as of 12/21/24 because they had their dehumidifier and air purifying units running for 41 days with no supporting dry logs to substantiate legitimate reason for running equipment that long. Insurance is paying out 13 days and is willing to offer more if dry logs are submitted. They don't exist. I was here every single day of the equipment running and not a single person came to obtain readings. I can see in the emails between the contractor and insurance that the contractor has threatened to come after us for the balance not paid out by insurance. They cannot threaten a mechanics lien due to 60 days having already passed, but I would love to know my rights should I need to take it to court. From my readings of the IICRC S500, dry logs are required. They haven't contacted us yet; I'm just preparing for the worst ($20k they are attempting to collect) but hoping for the best.
As @Cleanworks mentioned above companies like Drieaz and Phoenix both offer remote monitoring.

It's also not uncommon for insurance companies to try and screw water damage companies out of money. You almost always have to fight for your money.

Any idea if the water damage company was using Xactimate?
 

BIG WOOD

The Timminator
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
13,820
Location
Georgia
Name
Matt w.
Is there a charge to monitor the drying equipment every day? If there’s no charge for that service on the invoice, they have no evidence to charge for 41 days. You have the authority to pay them for just the 13 days the insurance company offered.
 

cobrashells

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Messages
3
Location
Ohio
Name
Shelby
As @Cleanworks mentioned above companies like Drieaz and Phoenix both offer remote monitoring.

It's also not uncommon for insurance companies to try and screw water damage companies out of money. You almost always have to fight for your money.

Any idea if the water damage company was using Xactimate?
Yes, they used Xactimate. The only argument my insurance makes is for supporting documentation which would be the dry logs. The problem is they DID NOT keep dry logs. I know this because I was present every day the equipment was ran. There was no remote monitoring, and no one came to physically obtain moisture readings. Insurance is happy to pay out whatever is due based on supporting documentation being submitted.
 

cobrashells

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Messages
3
Location
Ohio
Name
Shelby
Is there a charge to monitor the drying equipment every day? If there’s no charge for that service on the invoice, they have no evidence to charge for 41 days. You have the authority to pay them for just the 13 days the insurance company offered.
What was submitted to insurance has the following description associated with the line items specific to dehumidifier and air scrubber - Dehumidifier (per 24hr period) - 70-109 ppd - no monitor and Neg. air fan/air scrub - Large (per 24hr period) no monitoring.

From what I can read in the emails between contractor and insurance, the contractor is trying to justify their 41-day usage based on the time it took for scheduling and approval for asbestos testing through abatement approval. The insurance replied with there was no support for delaying mitigation to wait on coverage as mitigation should not be delayed while waiting on coverage. I myself can also provide proof that time was wasted by the contractor from when they received the asbestos test results to submitting the results to insurance. Ten days passed before submission to insurance for abatement approval even happened.
 
Back
Top Bottom