If it were me, I wouldn't post performance specs too quickly, in general cleaners tend to shop numbers from the comfort of their keyboard, all they have to compare against are published TM specs which are mostly exaggerated, it's one thing to compare an Elec. machine to a Gas unit, it's another to compare it to make believe specs?
For some reason, cleaners are impressed with utter BS, they know it's BS, but they have nothing else to judge by, so they want to see some BS specs. It has gotten so bad, that some TM mfgs. have selected the maximum cfm a blower can make as some basis for a model of their unit, if your unit makes 450 cfm at 14"hg, Don't call it a 600 just because a given blower could make that airflow at 0"hg sitting on a bench!
As long as Terry's elec. suck mop cleans well on 150' of hose and gets carpet dry in less than 4 hours, he'll have a market and solid customer base, and everyone realizes this was a prototype with the all day 180 gal tank, I was surprised to see comments on welding and material construction, you will be lucky to see the next generation with an attitude like that, and Yoakum if you run a "similar" unit, you should understand how inline vacuum boosters work, a third motor on the unit can't touch a dedicated booster 100' from the unit and closer to the wand, maybe you need a booster for your own unit? I hear Marty has one for sale.
Nobody has yet figured out how it runs those BIG vacs and pump on two cords?
