I am testing my wands to see what the performance is between each one and then see what the numbers are between Vw tm and my PC Legend
Today
PC Legend @ 2600 rpm with 50' 2.5 hose = 295-300 cfm
PCQ no glide = 256
WP 14 no glide = 261
Evo 16 with glide= 270
I tested as would come stock Evo comes with glide.
I think it is a accurate way to test as it shows a drop with all wands but the Evo shows more and should to it design. But all dropped, and it is testing the airflow that is passing through the wand.
The quality of the PCQ shows only a few numbers less than a wand with 2+"bigger slot.
Also showing why PC gets good results and better recovery than WP why so many say it has great dry times.
It will be interesting to see what the numbers will be when more airflow is introduced to them. Well the restrictions show different results
[/URL][/IMG]
Today
PC Legend @ 2600 rpm with 50' 2.5 hose = 295-300 cfm
PCQ no glide = 256
WP 14 no glide = 261
Evo 16 with glide= 270
I tested as would come stock Evo comes with glide.
I think it is a accurate way to test as it shows a drop with all wands but the Evo shows more and should to it design. But all dropped, and it is testing the airflow that is passing through the wand.
The quality of the PCQ shows only a few numbers less than a wand with 2+"bigger slot.
Also showing why PC gets good results and better recovery than WP why so many say it has great dry times.
It will be interesting to see what the numbers will be when more airflow is introduced to them. Well the restrictions show different results
