harryhides
Member
Here is every single Mikey post on that thread.
For the benefit of Scott and Chris, neither of whom know ALL of the details but are willing to slag many here as mindless minions but nonetheless have no problem being vocal about their opinions based on who knows what?
Keep in mind that Mike cannot control how much of Randy's issue with John he chooses to post - as per the advice of his (Randy's) own legal counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------
Mikey, your protecting crooks?
John H Klucznik
what happened to my Randy Royer question? The boy is a thief. I will find him with or without you. I have a judgment to collect on.
Mikey P
I've heard his side of the story and think it would be in your best interest to deal with your issues privately.
Just a hint but the big guy (you in this case) will rarely win a battle with a little guy in a he said she said/ David and Goliath battle.
Mikey P
Something like that.
I'm not implying the John is any where near as evil as HR but those damn bonnet cleaners can never be trusted 100%
Mikey P
On that note, John I am really protecting you more then him.
Please don't make me regret doing so.
diamond brian
Civil judgments are a matter of public record.
Creditors, however, must be careful not to violate a debtor's privacy (shotgunning one's payment history on a bulletin board--for example).
Mikey P
Exactly
Mikey P
I heard Randy's.
John,
Mikey P
I really think you should back off here.
IF Randy comes on with his story ( whether it's true or not) it won't be good for you, trust me.
Mikey P
Give me the word and I'll pull this thread and we can be done with it.
Mikey P
Don't be so quick to label Randy.
His response/side of the story is coming shortly.
Like Scott Warrington said.....Two sides to all of them...
Mikey P
If Randy does not come here and defend himself soon I'll give you a synopsis of his claims.
For the benefit of Scott and Chris, neither of whom know ALL of the details but are willing to slag many here as mindless minions but nonetheless have no problem being vocal about their opinions based on who knows what?
Keep in mind that Mike cannot control how much of Randy's issue with John he chooses to post - as per the advice of his (Randy's) own legal counsel.
---------------------------------------------------------
Mikey, your protecting crooks?
John H Klucznik
what happened to my Randy Royer question? The boy is a thief. I will find him with or without you. I have a judgment to collect on.
Mikey P
I've heard his side of the story and think it would be in your best interest to deal with your issues privately.
Just a hint but the big guy (you in this case) will rarely win a battle with a little guy in a he said she said/ David and Goliath battle.
Mikey P
Something like that.
I'm not implying the John is any where near as evil as HR but those damn bonnet cleaners can never be trusted 100%
Mikey P
On that note, John I am really protecting you more then him.
Please don't make me regret doing so.
diamond brian
Civil judgments are a matter of public record.
Creditors, however, must be careful not to violate a debtor's privacy (shotgunning one's payment history on a bulletin board--for example).
Mikey P
Exactly
Mikey P
I heard Randy's.
John,
Mikey P
I really think you should back off here.
IF Randy comes on with his story ( whether it's true or not) it won't be good for you, trust me.
Mikey P
Give me the word and I'll pull this thread and we can be done with it.
Mikey P
Don't be so quick to label Randy.
His response/side of the story is coming shortly.
Like Scott Warrington said.....Two sides to all of them...
Mikey P
If Randy does not come here and defend himself soon I'll give you a synopsis of his claims.