K
KP
Guest
What I was refering to was the spray below the fiber,it would be like a shower head pointed at your chest...imo
For those of you running the Hoss, How do you have it set up? I currently have a 360i and a Hoss on the truck and as much as i want the Hoss to work well I cant get it to perform as well as the 360i. I would much rather run the Hoss on commercial but the 360i is a clear winner every time when I compare the 2.
And if the 'great Mytee massacre' is any indication, you'd better send one, pronto!Still waiting to get my demo model...
Mr Studebaker, How can you claim that the inventor of rotary extraction and the RX-20 is copying you? You are the one who is the king of copy and misses the mark (with the failed Drimaster and the Hoss) . You have even copied the Rotovac Handle design. The new 360xl will blow the Hoss away.
Mr Studebaker, How can you claim that the inventor of rotary extraction and the RX-20 is copying you? You are the one who is the king of copy and misses the mark (with the failed Drimaster and the Hoss) . You have even copied the Rotovac Handle design. The new 360xl will blow the Hoss away.
"King of copy" you have got to be kidding?
A simple side by side comparison of the products provides the answer to your question. The true unique feature of the original RX design was the way you injected chemical through the rotating head and extracted waste water through the same rotating head. The shoes were/are just like a carpet wand. The rest of the concept was really no different from a standard 175 rotary. But because it didn't work to run it at 175 the motor was placed sideways and laid flat. Both the DriMaster and The HOSS use an entirely different design to accomplish injection and extraction than what the RX or 360 use. Unique enough that there are patents both in place and in process that cover our design. If your looking to pick a fight over copying the RX try*Mytee.
*The true King of copy