Larry,
It looks like the triple vac motor set up finely made the testing charts. Nice, I have been saying the 3 vac motors set up is just as good as a 4 vac motor setups when wand is on carpet. I was also saying that the 4 vac setup may get a bit more on the charts or testing, but it will cost one amp per one digit gained. I never tested CFM with 4 vacs to compare to the 3 vac setups, it was just a guess from my observation.
Did you use a relief valve in the 3 vac motor setup?
There has been a lot said about them 8.4 vac motors. Some say they do not perform as good as the manufacturer's published numbers. They good like a good vacuum motor on that chart.
Thanks for letting me know.
It would be nice to see the test in action. Not sure how the numbers got so high on the dual 8.4 motor set up using a wand in the mix. Has to be a series set up on all the testing in one way or another.
It looks like the triple vac motor set up finely made the testing charts. Nice, I have been saying the 3 vac motors set up is just as good as a 4 vac motor setups when wand is on carpet. I was also saying that the 4 vac setup may get a bit more on the charts or testing, but it will cost one amp per one digit gained. I never tested CFM with 4 vacs to compare to the 3 vac setups, it was just a guess from my observation.
Did you use a relief valve in the 3 vac motor setup?
There has been a lot said about them 8.4 vac motors. Some say they do not perform as good as the manufacturer's published numbers. They good like a good vacuum motor on that chart.
Thanks for letting me know.
It would be nice to see the test in action. Not sure how the numbers got so high on the dual 8.4 motor set up using a wand in the mix. Has to be a series set up on all the testing in one way or another.
Last edited:
