For a company that intends to grow, the 179 is an option. Last year we bought a new van, and a new truckmount. We adjusted our income to the perfect tax table mark using a combination of the 179 and traditional depreciation. This year and years after we are still depreciating the machine because its likely the truck will endure two machine installs. Essentially the 179 helped me pay for part of that machine the first year. Enter 2015. We had 70ish% growth, and did not accomodate with tax planning due to the cash flow pains of growing. About October, we realized it was going to be a huge issue. We went to our accountant and expressed to him we would need to buy another machine to handle production but needed to know if a 179 in 15 or waiting to 16 was best. He came back and said now was going to be a huge tax difference. So, next year it will be a centrifuge, rug plant, and then the year after full on restoration expansion. Then duct cleaning...im not sure how a growing company would never at least consider the options of a 179 with their CPA