I did not misperceive the carpet looking frizzy on that particular job, them post bonneting is the only explanation I could see causing it. But their is a high probability considering his help at the time that the carpet or bonnet was too dry. Like I said in twenty years I have never used a pad for agitating in the prespray and I have cleaned some nasties. So what is the supposed advantage of the padded 175, less water?, less rinsing? less time? What am I having to do extra to supposedly compensate for not using a pad?
Here are some pics of that job.
Here are some pics of that job.View attachment 75859 View attachment 75860 View attachment 75861 View attachment 75863
yeah, I'll get right on it.My dude, please take the pictures from the same angles... This is my OCD on pictures... Same fooking angle.......!
yeah, I'll get right on it.
I was noting the ignorance of your Russian admirer.
There are pads that are absorbent, unlike the red scrub pads, which may allow them to be used for quick touch-ups and "appearance maintenance" with a good encap product, and without having to immediately rinse/flush the area with HWE.
You familiar with VLM methods?