Mikey P
Administrator
Just curious..
TP said:I actually run a 2" wand with 2" hose fifty feet out and then TWO 2" hoses Y'ed off at the door all the way to the van.
MUCH more power than one 2.5" hose.
I actually run a 2" wand with 2" hose fifty feet out and then TWO 2" hoses Y'ed off at the door all the way to the van.
MUCH more power than one 2.5" hose.
It's funny to get the feed back on 4 to the door vs: the big hose, each side has their opinion.
Four to the door has in theory 28% more capacity than a single 2.5" hose. On the other hand, it has 60% more surface area (inside of the hose). It would make sense that 60% more surface area negates the advantage of only having 28% more theoretical flow capacity.
If business picks up I probably will glide it to prevent seam tears, as it is now if i see a seam I avoid it and wand the seam. Also for better dry times.
Tim
Rex Tyus said:I don't mind it either. Tim is a breath of fresh air as far as start up companies go. He is going to do well.
Still sucks to share a market you have owned for 5 years.
Yesterday I was in Dalton GA at professional testing labs.
I gotta tell you that they are blown away with the increase in airflow from the US cleaning products new wand.
Anyone here had the opportunity to use one yet?
After there remarks on the improvement I'm gonna get my hands on one of these babies