Shampoo was all there was available to "clean" carpeting up to the 70's.
You'd take a floor machine with a bassine brush, pile lifter and a wet vacuum.
First step was to use the pile lifter to break up the soap and dirt from prior cleanings.
Next you filled the solution tank with Shampoo and started scrubbing the carpet with the bassine brush.
Then you would try a pick up the wet soap with the vacuum.
You end up with a layer soap on top of a layer of dirt and you would do that every time you cleaned.
It left the carpet with multiple layers of dirt and soap until the carpet rotted out. Then you would replace the carpet and start the process over.
Dry foam and Bonnet cleaning reduced the amount of shampoo used for cleaning dramatically. It was quicker and the carpets dried much faster.
When extraction first came out it was amazing! The soap that you rinsed out was like shaving cream.
One customer accused us of ruining their brown carpet because we turned it red. It took awhile to convince them that red was the original color of the carpet.
Also wool carpeting was the norm.
Those were the days
Great let me grab the chunky monkey!
When I first started I was trained by a rainbow franchise in doing the shampoo/rinse.
I have to credit whittaker for making the truly first brittle shampoo...................not ( R)
When Whittaker approached us it was presented as a tile and grout cleaning system. "Rotowash" It could also be used for some carpet cleaning so the said.I remember back in the early 90's...(maybe late 80's?) a smart and progressive cleaner I know told me about Whittaker and "Crystal Dry" and how well it worked. I couldn't understand why it worked like it did, but he impressed me with what he did with it way back then.
Unfortunately for Whittaker, they never did find a way to capture the carpet cleaner market the way Rick has. They surely were an early, if not the earliest pioneer with this method.
My wife's college degree brings home lots of bacon.Yes it's the SHAMPOO method...................there ain't NO encapsulation...............method.
Just a marketing BS name to sell more....................SHAMPOO.
And I really don't think there is that much difference in the chemistry then and now.
Just taking a $12 gallon of chem and getting upwards of $40 plus.
And just like getting a college degree is the biggest FRAUD in the United States so is all this eNcAPSuLATiON BS.................is the biggest FRAUD in our industry.
Saiger" data-source="post: 4396353" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">We had a Deep Steam and we used it when all the machines were needed but it was mainly used in plant because it had smaller tanks. Great little machine. We had (3) of Ed York's Vapor Vac's, heavy as a tank, low pressure, low vacuum, slow cleaning. LOLBut I do remember seeing Richard Chavez also showing pics of the Deep Steam I believe...