F
FB19087
Guest
I probably should have said that by deleting def and EGR it greatly improves your mileage. My brother just did his Ram 2500 and is getting 25mpg consistently, where before it was 15 mpg. The reason I use him for example is because he figures it out at each fill by hand at the pump. He doesn't go off the computer or be like some of these dumb shits that hit 35 mpg on their instant mpg going down a hill and claim it to be their average.
I was having some issues with my Ford 6.0 and the mechanic told me to have it deleted. After they deleted it you never would have believed that it was the same diesel motor. It ran cooler, got much better mpg and had a lot more power.
My 6.7 diesel check engine light is on and guesa what the culprit is? It's initials are D.E.F.
I've only seen DEF at the pump in a few places in Montana. What I mostly see are these plastic jugs cramed into the trash bin at the fuel pumps. That if you don't buy sends your pickup into limp mode.
I 100% agree that we need to reduce NOx pollution, but there has to be some trade off because a plant that makes boxes and plastic DEF jugs is emitting NOx, not to mention that those jugs are here forever. The plant that makes the parts for emission systems is polluting. So if we just made the diesels run better and get better mileage seems to be the best alternative to me. Less diesel burned is less emissions. And if this country really wanted to reduce emissions we would lower speed limits to increase mpg as well. Montana is 80 mph. I go every bit of 80 when I can, but if we all went 70 it would burn a lot less fuel. We should also ship more goods and freight by rail. I am biased on that, but trains are the greenest compared to the other alternatives.
I think something might have been wrong with your buddy's egr system/DPF. You'll potentially gain more power (with other mods/flash) but the mpg gain shouldn't be that drastic. Many choose to delete rather than fix (I used to do that myself on old Datsuns....just a valve and a pipe then)
The def reduces the reliance on egr . The egr systems themselves have led to upgraded complimentary systems and part so you aren't needing the timing differences and you aren't recirculating as much dirty air into the intake/chambers. You will likely see continued advances in the systems to the point where stripping them off doesn't do much at all. Yes it adds complexity....
Looking at how much pollutants diesels produce I'm not sure that reducing the added footprint associated with the emissions systems would be a net positive or even close. We can also look elsewhere to see what that looks like. There is only so much you can do to make a diesel "run better"/more efficient.
I am surprised Montana doesn't have more DEF pumps by now