Ivan Turner
Supportive Member
Fractional ownership in high end toys like airplanes, boats and real estate like condominiums has been in existence for a long time.
The advantage are many, risk are reduced and by and large the real reason for most fractional agreements is that the buy in cost is reduced.
So my question is this; does it make sense for restorers to form fractional agreements for large scale drying equipment like; trailer mounted desiccants, high output generators, etc.
As a pilot, I had checked into many fract opportunities, each of which were very affordable. The concept I that each owner is responsible for the buy in cost, plus a nominal fee per hour used.
All fract owners are maintenance and other miscellaneous cost based on their time in aircraft. The biggest advantage is that one has access to large scale equipment without the full cost. Like mentioned, there are disadvantages as well.
This is just a thought for discussion.
The advantage are many, risk are reduced and by and large the real reason for most fractional agreements is that the buy in cost is reduced.
So my question is this; does it make sense for restorers to form fractional agreements for large scale drying equipment like; trailer mounted desiccants, high output generators, etc.
As a pilot, I had checked into many fract opportunities, each of which were very affordable. The concept I that each owner is responsible for the buy in cost, plus a nominal fee per hour used.
All fract owners are maintenance and other miscellaneous cost based on their time in aircraft. The biggest advantage is that one has access to large scale equipment without the full cost. Like mentioned, there are disadvantages as well.
This is just a thought for discussion.