Wandslinger
Member
Can you provide the written version....holy $hit
Choke itI have a real tm. I don’t need a 2.5 hose.
Did you ever buy a different motorcycle?I don't even think about it anymore. I got 5 jobs tomorrow. I'm really not looking forward to it. two or three is my comfy zone, but this week is just nuts. Going Glamping on the 26th so my schedule is pretty packed before I go. Maybe when I come back I'll be nicer and more balanced.
No. Still got the FXDR 114. I would love to get an Africa Twin or Pan America. From what I’m seeing with the PA there are a bunch of little issues. Hope they get them worked out.Did you ever buy a different motorcycle?
I was just trying to be an ass with that comment. I've use 2.5 in the pastChoke it
What would the parameters of the bet be placed upon?Be interesting to see an actual scientific study to see if those configurations make a bit of difference on typical residential hose runs. I’d be a thousand dollars it makes no difference. If anything, it is probably placebo effect.
I would say me running 2 inch hose on the way to my SS 12 makes a much bigger difference than any of that on residential runs.
I’m specifically talking about decreased dry times by running either one of those configurations on 100’ or even 150’ hose runs. A 1.5” wand only uses 180 to 200 CFM at the wand. So if you’re only running a short residential run, I think anything more than 300 CFM gives you nada.What would the parameters of the bet be placed upon?
I wouldn’t describe it as a ’placebo effect” a few more CFM or degrees of heat assist in the quality of the finished product
time savings is probably the largest benefit
my Butlers have 50 feet of 2.5 hose on the live reel connected to an additional 50 feet of 2 inch
If your business model revolves primarily around 100 foot runs I tend to agreeI’m specifically talking about decreased dry times by running either one of those configurations on 100’ or even 150’ hose runs. A 1.5” wand only uses 180 to 200 CFM at the wand. So if you’re only running a short residential run, I think anything more than 300 CFM gives you nada.
Thing is, if your wand can only support a maximum of 200 CFM and you’re short hose run only uses up maybe 100 CFM, then what’s the point?If your business model revolves primarily around 100 foot runs I tend to agree
Certain residential carpet like Berber benefit from higher CFM
and if you dual off your truck to do upholstery and carpet , the additional CFM is a welcome addition
Message me. I have tons of it. I’ll cut you off a piece.I am about to purchase a 2.5 inch hose to run to an inline filter for my 870 maybe like 10ft
Thank youMessage me. I have tons of it. I’ll cut you off a piece.
Be interesting to see an actual scientific study to see if those configurations make a bit of difference on typical residential hose runs.
Operator error.no one that I'm aware of has counted gallons out/gallons recovered with anything approaching "serious scientific" protocol.
If I recall, there was a backyard BBQ fest test years ago in Tx.
Nothing conclusive no measurable difference as I recall.
But I'm a tad skeptical, as I believe there may have been some bias involved
..L.T.A.
I believe a guy can better results with less performance through better technique.
Ask your wifesay it ain't so....
now the question is, would that same "better technique" operator realize any "practical" benefit with a bigger hole'd hose?
..L.T.A.
When I increased vacuum I moved faster wearing me out faster.say it ain't so....
now the question is, would that same "better technique" operator realize any "practical" benefit with a bigger hole'd hose?
..L.T.A.
From what I’m seeing with the PA there are a bunch of little issues. Hope they get them worked out.
I feel sorry for that poor gay couple.
Party pooper