Mike The Hoss

[Askal]

Cleaning effectiveness being equal tell us the SF production in open areas ( empty homes or large open commercial areas) between a glided wand, an rx, and the Hoss. I think a roundabout number for us is 1300 sf for a wand and 1000 sf for an rx. That is a moderately soiled carpet that is pre vacuumed. Keeping in mind mileage may vary!
Al
ps The rx is a more effective cleaning at the above rates but the dry times are longer. You just cant rush an rx.

 

[Mikey P]

Too soon to really say Al but it's probably right in the middle of the two.

I think the HOSS would be just a little quicker than the RX due to better recovery.


I know the RV360i is quite a bit slower than the 175/wand combo.

 

[Jim Martin]

pending the carpet...you can move the Hoss faster then the rx and still get good flush and recovery

 

[GeneMiller]

the better comparison for me is which cleans better. i'm willing to give up a little time for a better job. dry times are also critical here because of the high humidity. I'm curious which leaves the carpet drier, the wand or the Hoss ?

gene

 

[vincent]

Too soon to really say Al but it's probably right in the middle of the two.

I think the HOSS would be just a little quicker than the RX due to better recovery.


I know the RV360i is quite a bit slower than the 175/wand combo.

Are you saying you're prescrubing with the 175 and rinsing with the hoss?

I disagree on the 360i being slower than (my way) whittaker/wand combo.

 

[Jim Martin]

the better comparison for me is which cleans better. i'm willing to give up a little time for a better job. dry times are also critical here because of the high humidity. I'm curious which leaves the carpet drier, the wand or the Hoss ?

gene

THe Hoss....the recovery on this this is the best....you will get speed and good dry times...even in your weather.....