Very little but if ur paying the assistant anyway then less is made if not doing the job.
Why would I be paying them it they weren't working, salary? More is made by sticking to a good minimum.. If you just give it away that's what it's worth to the custy.
I also wouldn't set it up with nothing close so it isn't really a realistic scenerio. I would also count on many of those type jobs adding on or having more so e next time.
This is where the example goes astray. This is a very realistic scenario for an O/O, and not sure why you would think differently(we can't just send Pedro, or John,or D'Shawn that's cleaning in the area). We take it as it comes in when we are slow and will schedule all over the place just to keep working, and with that there should be a minimum... So, Mrs. P just had her kids bedroom painted and while everything is out of it she wants the carpet cleaned tomorrow(89.00 from now on).. So Mrs. P has off on Monday and wants her FR carpet cleaned first thing in the morning(89.00 from now on).. So Mrs. P has all the furniture out because she has new coming the day after tomorrow (89.00 from now on). I could go on all day...
I don't work for many people that don't have both working in the house(maybe that's the reason they can't be home all day) and that limits flexibility?
I can't really come up with a reason not to stick with a minimum and if they don't want to pay, don't go(. If I sit doing nothing that's just fine with me). If want to make money while I'm slow I'll recycle some brass quick connects.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
I'm just saying...