Please explain what you think happens when you have just the right amount of cfm at the wand and too much cfm at the wand......
For example, if a glided Prochem Ti wand can flow 225 cfm and you have a TM system that produces 225 cfm would your relief valve ever open if it was set to 12, 14, or even 16 inches of Hg?
How about if your TM system now produces 300 cfm but you are still using the same Ti wand.....do you think the relief valve would open if set at 12, 14, or 16 inches of Hg.?
I know that cfm is air movement and lift is a restriction of that air movement, and that they act inversely during cleaning. But does it matter if you run the TM at full power creating more cfm than can go thru a wand? Wouldn't that make the TM more inefficient and waste gas and put more wear & tear on the TM, especially if you did that every job for, say, five years?
I would think hose run length would also affect things......how would a hose run of 100 feet differ from a hose run of 300 feet under the above conditions?
Just trying to figure out how to run a TM the most efficient way, especially when doing residential (short hose run) vs. commercial (longer hose runs). A 47 blower running at 85% can produce about 320 to 330 cfm. Most guys want the most cfm that their TM's can produce.....is that really the way to go?
Maybe this is a hard question to answer, but I would like any thoughts that you have about it.
Thanks.
PS: Marty, please don't attempt to read this or your head will probably explode.
For example, if a glided Prochem Ti wand can flow 225 cfm and you have a TM system that produces 225 cfm would your relief valve ever open if it was set to 12, 14, or even 16 inches of Hg?
How about if your TM system now produces 300 cfm but you are still using the same Ti wand.....do you think the relief valve would open if set at 12, 14, or 16 inches of Hg.?
I know that cfm is air movement and lift is a restriction of that air movement, and that they act inversely during cleaning. But does it matter if you run the TM at full power creating more cfm than can go thru a wand? Wouldn't that make the TM more inefficient and waste gas and put more wear & tear on the TM, especially if you did that every job for, say, five years?
I would think hose run length would also affect things......how would a hose run of 100 feet differ from a hose run of 300 feet under the above conditions?
Just trying to figure out how to run a TM the most efficient way, especially when doing residential (short hose run) vs. commercial (longer hose runs). A 47 blower running at 85% can produce about 320 to 330 cfm. Most guys want the most cfm that their TM's can produce.....is that really the way to go?
Maybe this is a hard question to answer, but I would like any thoughts that you have about it.
Thanks.
PS: Marty, please don't attempt to read this or your head will probably explode.
