TimP
Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2007
- Messages
- 4,055
Ryan said:You can talk all you want Mikey, call names and make fun of peoples businesses, but at the end of the day numbers don't lie.
The average 175 scrubber weighs 75 pounds. A 360 weighs what 35?
With the 175 your scrubbing with either and aggressive brush or pad while the 360 only has a few inches of vac slots and nylon balls on the carpet. Its just common sense that the 175 would agitate better, the a couple passes with a good wand will suck all that crap right up. The biggest plus I could see from coming from a Rotovac is something that could make your business look somewhat proprietary.
The problem with the bet is your going to say your side won and everyone else will say their side won. How about we do the test double blind. A neutral party sets up two equal sizes of equally trashed carpet. Both carpets are presprayed with the same prespray and given the same amount of time to be cleaned. Then the cleaners leave and the carpets are raked and put on display. No one will know which tool cleaned which carpet, then everyone can vote for the best one.
If you do that I'm in for a $100.
A 175 is in the ball park of 100 lbs
When you're talking about pressure of agitation you have to take into consideration surface area. The slots and balls have less surface area and are able to penetrate the carpet fiber better than a pad. A pad has more surface area so the pressure is less than what you think cause the weight is spread over the entire pad surface. That's why you can scratch things off with a scraper that a wash cloth couldn't get.
I agree with the problem of judging. The way Mikey wants to judge will work in his favor cause the 360i will be able to suck deeper into the fiber than a glided wand and the agitation will pull more fibers out.
Now if Meat uses a non glided wand I don't think there will be much of a difference either way depending on how long and fast (chop strokes) Meat scrubs. With a glided wand you can't get the fibers and extraction all the way down the fibers like you would with a slot like a 360i has or a regular wand, not to mention the difference in surface are when comparing wand lips to glide lips. Because of this the rotary extractors without glides get deeper into the fiber compared to glided wands. So there is more over all extraction of fibers and dirt compared to a glided wand. You'll see more removal of hair and fiber, and some extra dirt that is buried in the fibers.
I've gone back to cleaning with the rotary extractor myself. Because I know the whole fiber is getting scrubbed and it digs out the lower layers of dirt grime and it also gets up hairs especially pet hairs. A glided wand can't do this even with a pad scrub, it might with a brush but still a glided wand has difficulty sucking deep into the fibers. And I'm not going to go without my glide.
Now based on appearance there wont be no clear winner or loser. And if using an unglided wand I don't know if there will be any difference either way. The way the rotovac or a rotary extractor wins out is because of not having to put the energy into cleaning, no chop stroke and no fighting of unglided wands.
BTW you can't do the weight for a test, because you have to know that there is exactly the same amount of soil on each side before cleaning. And you have to know that each side of carpet weighs exactly the same. And in my opinion you can't control both variables unless you take a clean piece of carpet weight them both being clean and adding the same exact amount of dirt. Then looking at the change in weight once they were dry. And somehow I don't think the test would replicate real world conditions.