meAt said:
I don't anything about his "new design" TM's..maybe he has the glaring warts worked out..I donno
But if you get guys that actually own his TMs to talk "off the record" you may not be so impressed with them
Hey, Larry...
As far as I know, you don't know anyone who has any of the open- frame systems. But to clue you in... We've been building them exclusively for about 2 years now.
We have as close to 100% success with them as you can get. (I'd say we have 100%, but it would sound like an exaggeration.) For instance, right now, we're getting ready to ship 2 to a customer in New Zealand, who bought 2 about a year and a half ago. He's delighted, or he wouldn't have ordered two more. (And if you think about it, by having 2 for this much time, the chances of a problem showing up are twice as much as with one.)
Ross Craig ("Roro") will be receiving his in about 4 weeks (allowing for shipping time to New Zealand.), so check with him.
Kevin McCreary is another. He's been cleaning carpet for over 20 years and has had every system imaginable during that time, from
Vortex to
Hydramaster, to White Magic and several others. He knows truck mounts, knows what he wants and he's picky.
He got a 3047 Dominator oil- fired (which is belt- driven) in September. He's tickled and says it's "everything I hoped it would be". (He sold his
HydraMaster Titan after getting the Dominator.) He did have to work on the pump once and remarked,
"One of the things I like so much about this system is that you designed it with the owner in mind. (I literally custom- designed it for him, to fit his Ford Transit Connect. That 47 blower working with a continuous pump- out was a first.)
It's so logical and easy to work on, it's like you read my mind." His system has had a (vacuum) flow switch problem. The manufacturer changed the design and made it in a way that didn't last, for some reason, which is too bad, because previously, that was the most trouble- free switch we'd ever used.. So I over-nighted him another and I'm getting him an entirely new kind (thanks, Bob Savage).
Other customers, including Sherman Williams (belt- driven 1836 Dominator), Billy Walker (belt- driven Dominator: the first one, reconstructed from an old "Hammer" I sold him in 1998), Ken Williams (belt- driven 1836 Dominator, which he received Saturday), don't do the internet thing, but are available to "testify", if you want to call them.
You'll see yourself when you get to Nashville.
And by the way... The folded- over sheet metal approach in itself isn't "bad". The successful and popular "Hammer", "SledgeHammer" and "PowerPak" systems I designed and built in the 1990's were all "broken metal" designs. (I can't keep a used Hammer in stock, they're in such high demand...) The basic difference with them was that the spans weren't as wide or long, so metal thickness inconsistencies (i.e., "close tolerances") didn't affect them like they did the subsequent designs that had longer and or wider spans. The systems with the wider spans were all direct- coupled. And a system frame that flexes simply doesn't work well with DC drive trains.
meAt said:
lastly, I like DooWayne.
I consider him a good guy.
Thanks, Larry... I wuv you, too...
![Lol :lol: :lol:](/images/smilies/lol.gif)