The Great Wand Off of 2016

Cleanworks

Moderator
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,866
Location
New Westminster,BC
Name
Ron Marriott
Nice review Mikey. I can't be bothered with 2 inch wands these days, yeah, I know, i'm getting old. I really like that ss 12 inch but I agree that it is stupid to have a 2 inch bulb on a 1 1/2 wand. Guys that use 1 1/2 wands don't use 2 inch hose to the wand. If we did, we would have a 2 inch wand. I would really like to see it in a swivel version. If some is going to do it soon, I will wait, otherwise i will be buying a ss 12 incher.
 

Bob Pruitt

Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
2,677
Location
earth
Name
Robert Pruitt
Maybe I'm wrong..
The videos were excellent. I really don't understand why Interlink didn't call you in more during development of their wand. I'm sure their wand was an expensive enterprise but it seems to be typical of development by committee products. We knew the Tom wand was the one to measure the others by and I was surprised at the praise the SS wand received and now that is under consideration as well. The Dang wand may be a good wand if you have employees that are going to throw it around due to price and adequate swivel. Throw away wands have a place in this business as well. The Evolution wand is heavily promoted and I don't understand why it hasn't been upgraded or replaced by Hydra Master. It is a disincentive to buying one of their truck mounts. IMO.
 

Mikey P

Administrator
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
115,991
Location
The High Chapperal
Nice review Mikey. I can't be bothered with 2 inch wands these days, yeah, I know, i'm getting old. I really like that ss 12 inch but I agree that it is stupid to have a 2 inch bulb on a 1 1/2 wand. Guys that use 1 1/2 wands don't use 2 inch hose to the wand. If we did, we would have a 2 inch wand. I would really like to see it in a swivel version. If some is going to do it soon, I will wait, otherwise i will be buying a ss 12 incher.


You wont regret the Mach12, just insist on the round profile 2pc..
 

ruff

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
San Francisco, CA
Name
Ofer Kolton
After working with a 14" the 12" just feels too small.
Not sure how much difference in water recovery it makes for a machine with smaller blowers like the 370. But it sure was annoying to work with the 12. It was great with a portable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Desk Jockey

Mikey P

Administrator
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
115,991
Location
The High Chapperal
I agree Kevin, I used a 2" 14 since 1999.

Not interested in working that hard anymore.


Dennis Bruders said it best, "If this wand was available while I was cleaner, I'd probably still be cleaning today."


The M12 and SS12 are true gems.
 

Jimmy L

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
15,250
Location
Ne
Name
Jimmy L
In reality using that 12 incher and over lapping strokes you're only cleaning 10 inches.
 

Jimmy L

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
15,250
Location
Ne
Name
Jimmy L
Ancient carpet cleaning theorists seem to disagree on that theory.
To say that you are "Recleaning" that 2 inches is in essence saying those 2 inches were never clean in the first place.

I stand by my logical statement that you are only cleaning 10 inches instead of 12.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bruce Humphrey

Desk Jockey

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Messages
64,833
Location
A planet far far away
Name
Rico Suave
Some people are used to handling small tools James. :winky:

I personally have always felt the bigger the better as long as quality isn't compromised in the name of production.

ZIP IT! :cool:
 

ruff

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
San Francisco, CA
Name
Ofer Kolton
You aren't very tolerant to change, are you?
Resi work is no big deal with a 12.
Your aging body will thank you
Change my....
As you can tell, very tolerant :winky:

14 is better- less passes. Easier on the body. Once you've become used to 14, the 12 just feels toy-ish. Strictly TeeMF material.
You want easy, just put a hole glide on it and it feels like pushing nothing anyhow.

Brudders (save for PR) won't be cleaning carpets these days no matter what. Too smart for it. Tell him to stick to manufacturing and come up with a better 14"
 

Papa John

Lifetime Supportive Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
6,972
Location
San Francisco, CA.
Name
John Stewart
I just don't understand how the bentley with it's unusual metal glide can glide smoothly without tearing or pulling up carpet strands.

I agree, that's why I removed the metal one and bought the Teflon glide for the Bentley. However I didn't like how the spray pattern was hitting the wand instead of the carpet. So I had to make my own manifolds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Desk Jockey

BIG WOOD

The Timminator
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
14,097
Location
Georgia
Name
Matt w.
I agree, that's why I removed the metal one and bought the Teflon glide for the Bentley. However I didn't like how the spray pattern was hitting the wand instead of the carpet. So I had to make my own manifolds.
Why did you go throug the hassle of making your own manifolds? All you had to do was put two washers in between the manifold and the head to push the manifold away from the head so it wouldn't spray the glide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy L

BIG WOOD

The Timminator
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
14,097
Location
Georgia
Name
Matt w.
In reality you are always cleaning 12 inches , you're just re cleaning 2 inches.
Where are you guys getting this cleaning 10 inches or reclining 2 inch idea?

Why don't you try cleaning like IICRC told us to clean and reclean 6inches with a 12inch wand.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy L

Papa John

Lifetime Supportive Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Messages
6,972
Location
San Francisco, CA.
Name
John Stewart
Why did you go throug the hassle of making your own manifolds? All you had to do was put two washers in between the manifold and the head to push the manifold away from the head so it wouldn't spray the glide.

I don't think that will work because of how the manifold is held to the wand--- but I'll look into it.- thanks
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom