ACE
Member
What do you pay yourself as a 941 / w-2 employee vs. with distributions (not subject to SS / Medicare). I hear 40% / 60% is a good rule of thumb.
sam miller said:whats Your account suggest?
ACE said:To complicate matters, the dividend tax rate is set to match the effective marginal rate on income in 2013. If that’s the case, why not just pay yourself all salary and fully fund your social security account? A corporation is probably the way to go if your income is really significant and you have time to map out a tax strategy (401k, IRA, insurance, and other tax free pircks). At this point it’s just a PIA to me :x .
steve g said:ACE said:To complicate matters, the dividend tax rate is set to match the effective marginal rate on income in 2013. If that’s the case, why not just pay yourself all salary and fully fund your social security account? A corporation is probably the way to go if your income is really significant and you have time to map out a tax strategy (401k, IRA, insurance, and other tax free pircks). At this point it’s just a PIA to me :x .
I am 38 years old and by the time I am ready to collect social security it will be long gone, I would rather keep my money. the reason for still taking the dividend even if it matches the effective marginal rate is because you still get out of the 15% self employment tax beyond your set salary, why pay both?? the 15% is really the killer tax for a business owner because it taxed right off the top, no deductions like mortgage, dependants, or charitable contributions.
if a business owner has 3 kids and has a $300000 home, and he shows a profit of say 80k as an S corp taking 10k/year salary he might just get by with actually paying nothing in that example or the tax bill is likely to be less than 2 grand. if this owner is not an S corp guess what, how does 12 grand in self employment tax grab ya??