I was right...

Mikey P

Administrator
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
114,127
Location
The High Chapperal
This is a fantastic wand.

  1. Affordable
  2. 14"/1.5"
  3. One unplugable, drip and streak free nozzle, with no over spray
  4. Internal-easy peasy swap out- fit Glides
  5. Excellent extraction and drying
  6. Very maneuverable and a joy to use!

Needs a few tweaks to make it nearly perfect.

Really it's only drawback is its head height but with the shoulderless, triangle-shaped head it gets under more things than you'd think and for larger areas in most cases the furniture is not going to be an issue, where you would want to use a 14 inch wand..


PXL_20241008_185603368.jpgPXL_20241008_185624365.jpgPXL_20241008_185649619.jpg
 

Luky

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2023
Messages
292
Location
Chicagoland
Name
Mario
This is a fantastic wand.

  1. Affordable
  2. 14"/1.5"
  3. One unplugable, drip and streak free nozzle, with no over spray
  4. Internal-easy peasy swap out- fit Glides
  5. Excellent extraction and drying
  6. Very maneuverable and a joy to use!

Needs a few tweaks to make it nearly perfect.

Really it's only drawback is its head height but with the shoulderless, triangle-shaped head it gets under more things than you'd think and for larger areas in most cases the furniture is not going to be an issue, where you would want to use a 14 inch wand..


View attachment 128676View attachment 128677View attachment 128678
Not exactly a low profile. What other attributes are making this wand appealing? I'm trying really hard, is it lightweight? Is the head a bit heavier compared to the rest of the body? Is the weight of the wand less than seven lbs? I like double S feature, however bottom S is prolonged to make up for the angle of the jet . Jet is screaming for an extender
( or maybe the picture doesn't show everything)
I can't help it, I like my 13.5" Ti more with passing time. I understand that ugly duckling wands deserve to be loved too.
No offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BIG WOOD

Mikey P

Administrator
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
114,127
Location
The High Chapperal
Not exactly a low profile. What other attributes are making this wand appealing? I'm trying really hard, is it lightweight? Is the head a bit heavier compared to the rest of the body? Is the weight of the wand less than seven lbs? I like double S feature, however bottom S is prolonged to make up for the angle of the jet . Jet is screaming for an extender
( or maybe the picture doesn't show everything)
I can't help it, I like my 13.5" Ti more with passing time. I understand that ugly duckling wands deserve to be loved too.
No offense.

No streaking/clashing
No over spray
No drips
Hole or Slot Glides @ instant swapping
Lightweight
Equally as effective as a multi jet, but with less water ( 4 flow)

You know, everything your PCTI isn't or doesnt
 

BIG WOOD

The Timminator
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
13,648
Location
Georgia
Name
Matt w.
Please come up with a better name on this wand than hydrahoe. WTH was hydramaster thinking when they were pushing that backbreaking wand??? Idiots couldn't find a better name than that? This isn't gardening? And the 80's kids were just starting to push wands back in the 90's. Did those idiots have any idea what the word "hoe" was to that generation?
 

Jim Pemberton

MB Exclusive.
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
12,311
Name
Jim Pemberton
Please come up with a better name on this wand than hydrahoe. WTH was hydramaster thinking when they were pushing that backbreaking wand??? Idiots couldn't find a better name than that? This isn't gardening? And the 80's kids were just starting to push wands back in the 90's. Did those idiots have any idea what the word "hoe" was to that generation?

Yes, "Hydrahoe" was an unfortunate name.

So was the trade association called "Association of Interior Decor Specialists"

Little did they know what AIDS would be associated with a decade later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: they live

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom