Jimmy L
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2006
- Messages
- 15,251
- Name
- Jimmy L
An tHAS a fACt jACK!
encapman said:The encapsulation method is intended for keeping typical commercial carpets looking their best between periodic HWE cleanings.
encapman said:Truth be told, no method of carpet cleaning can truly "sanitize" a carpet. Some methods pull more contaminants from the carpet than others. And HWE has the potential to recover the highest amount of soil in a single shot. Encap is intended to serve as a maintenance system that will keep the carpet looking better/longer between HWE cleanings. However no method of carpet cleaning can honestly be touted as "sanitizing" a carpet.
Some time ago we heard from a cleaner who told us the schools he was cleaning with Releasit were testing better than other schools in his state. Their school district tested the school's carpets for mold content and the cleaner told us that his schools were testing with lower mold content than other schools in his state. Well that got us to thinking; perhaps the polymer was holding the mold in suspension. So we had a lab scientist do some testing with Releasit. Here is a PDF of the test results...
http://www.excellent-supply.com/Polymer ... arpets.pdf
Please do NOT take this test as a statement that Releasit is an anti-mold product. We are not stating that at all. All we're noting from this test is that there was an interesting quantifiable reduction in mold in a carpet that was cleaned with Releasit. A lot more testing would need to be done in order to confirm what we saw in this singular test. Yet, these test results were interesting to see.
My reason for referring to the test here is that this research seems to indicate that the polymer may be capable of holding certain types of contaminants in a polymerized state, thereby possibly reducing the contaminants impact on the indoor environment. But as I said above, NO method of cleaning should be considered to be a sanitizing method of carpet care (not encap, not even HWE). And I do agree with the comments above, HWE would be a better choice when cleaning health sensitive areas such as daycare centers, etc.
The encapsulation method is intended for keeping typical commercial carpets looking their best between periodic HWE cleanings. It affords the building occupants the opportunity to enjoy cleaner looking carpets on a day-in day-out basis. And it enables the carpet cleaner to provide the service in a profitable manner. Thus in its intended application, encap becomes a win-win for both parties.
tmdry said:Spoken like a true Professional.
encapman said:You guys are too funny. You're getting way too political about this. Lighten up a little. All these methods are just tools in the toolbox. You'll naturally want to select the right tool to fit the task at hand, like any professional businessman would. When it comes to commercial glue down carpet, encapsulation is a mighty powerful tool to have in the arsenal, but it's not the only tool. So choose the best method that will keep the carpet looking its best so you can keep your customer happy and maintain a profitable business. That's simple.
just shows more ignorance about how to clean than anything else.OP/ENCAP/BONNETS are good on commercial grade carpet for a "clean" appearance, but there's NO WAY any LOGICAL person can say it's a better cleaning system than HWE. While no system will remove 100% of soil, HWE will out clean pads/cimax anyday...when used both methods together you get great results. just my .2
duckster said:It is always a battle between techniques. You have the dry foamers, the encapers, the portys, the TMs - all battle for the number one spot (sorry if I left a technique out). Each has its good points and YES, each has its bad points and I will not be goaded into naming them so give up before you start. Read on.
Nations practice the same stupid game. Religions have been doing it for thousands of years. Jackasses and Elephants fight it out; not in zoos but in the news.
In the end while it looks like a game of who HAS the biggest one, to anyone watching it is more like who IS the biggest one.
Can we put this dead end discussion to rest or does someone else have something to prove?
Man, the testosterone flows like a raging river in this place sometimes.